and swapping sensors all willy nilly to try to solve this only means I damage the door finish and paint on the frame of the door.
I understand that there are downsides to having to test. Resolving sensor RF issues is definitely frustrating, but what is being suggested is not willy nilly. It is very much the opposite.
Introducing a new sensor to the system is a different test than introducing a proven working one. In these situations the best thing to do when testing is to eliminate variables and test to prove or disprove the most likely circumstance first.
Supervision errors and intermittent signal loss almost always point to one of two things: sensor battery power is too low to send the same quality signal, or the environment is deteriorating the signal from that sensor. (often both of these combined have an effect)
Swapping a working sensor’s location with the malfunctioning one is the most definitive test in this circumstance.
I’ve gotten alerts that RF supervisory signal was lost, and I’ve had the behavior described above where it alerts on door open but not on door close, and thinks the sensor is still open when it’s not.
Supervision checks failing are a key indicator of environmental signal loss as well. Low battery, general sensor malfunction or antenna damage are also possible. In some cases, an extremely large number of wireless sensors can cause supervision issues due to so many sensors reporting at once, but that would not affect individual open/close signal performance.
Do you have any other sensors reporting supervision loss?
It’s frustrating that I keep hearing the only means of troubleshooting is “trial and error” when I am well within specs and it worked reliably for 8 months prior to the problem starting.
I understand. Wireless issues can be frustrating to test given the brevity of feedback from the systems.
One thing to keep in mind is that the sensors are extraordinarily simple.
Advanced diagnostics and complicated signaling doesn’t lend itself to 2-3 year battery life (typically) from a 3v battery. Or a $20-$30 cost.
Supervision is the additional diagnostic tool to use in these scenarios.
The panel cannot see why a signal is degraded or not received. It can report when a sensor is having trouble communicating via supervision checks, and operational differences will often alert you to an issue.
Another option (although a more expensive one to jump to) is to use a signal repeater. Repeaters will listen for the RF frequency of the sensor, and re-broadcast the signal at full power from its position. In general a repeater will greatly boost the signal quality of all sensors.